<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Do I Work For A Startup?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/</link>
	<description>I can see the future, because I live in it today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Danielle Morrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danielle Morrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=527#comment-64</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Sunil - Yep, you&#039;re right I think I was confused about what &quot;early stage&quot; was referring to.Â  Strikethrough edit to come.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, thanks for the Union Square Ventures blog link, I&#039;m not currently following them and I should definitely read it on a more regular basis.Â  Are there any other VC blogs you would suggest?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sunil &#8211; Yep, you&#8217;re right I think I was confused about what &#8220;early stage&#8221; was referring to.Â  Strikethrough edit to come.</p>
<p>Also, thanks for the Union Square Ventures blog link, I&#8217;m not currently following them and I should definitely read it on a more regular basis.Â  Are there any other VC blogs you would suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sunil Garg		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunil Garg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=527#comment-59</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The term might be used in reference to the &lt;em&gt;early stage of a startup&lt;/em&gt; in addition to the &lt;em&gt;early stage of an established business&lt;/em&gt;, but I typically see it used in the first context.

Union Square Ventures &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2006/09/early_stage_inv.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Early stage investing encompasses seed, startup, angel, and first round investing.&quot; which is more specific than my original description, but along the same lines.

Apart from revenue, profitability, or exit strategy (eg. acquisition), I&#039;m not sure what other lines one could draw to objectively make the decision that a company is no longer a startup.

There are numerous companies that have been around for years and have gone through multiple rounds of funding (&lt;a href=&quot;http://pelago.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pelago&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; come to mind) which I would still consider to be startups, even though neither is &quot;early stage&quot;. Conversely, companies like &lt;a href=&quot;http://delicious.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Delicious&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://facebook.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; don&#039;t fit the stereotype, because the first was acquired, and despite its &lt;a href=&quot;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080131/chatty-zuckerberg-tells-all-about-facebook-finances/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lack of profitability&lt;/a&gt;, the second is simply too large.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term might be used in reference to the <em>early stage of a startup</em> in addition to the <em>early stage of an established business</em>, but I typically see it used in the first context.</p>
<p>Union Square Ventures <a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2006/09/early_stage_inv.html" rel="nofollow">says</a> &#8220;Early stage investing encompasses seed, startup, angel, and first round investing.&#8221; which is more specific than my original description, but along the same lines.</p>
<p>Apart from revenue, profitability, or exit strategy (eg. acquisition), I&#8217;m not sure what other lines one could draw to objectively make the decision that a company is no longer a startup.</p>
<p>There are numerous companies that have been around for years and have gone through multiple rounds of funding (<a href="http://pelago.com/" rel="nofollow">Pelago</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a> come to mind) which I would still consider to be startups, even though neither is &#8220;early stage&#8221;. Conversely, companies like <a href="http://delicious.com/" rel="nofollow">Delicious</a> and <a href="http://facebook.com/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> don&#8217;t fit the stereotype, because the first was acquired, and despite its <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080131/chatty-zuckerberg-tells-all-about-facebook-finances/" rel="nofollow">lack of profitability</a>, the second is simply too large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Danielle Morrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danielle Morrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=527#comment-58</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Sunil!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What you say is very interesting. Â I&#039;ve heard &quot;early stage company&quot; used to refer to companies that have been startups for awhile and are transitioning to full fledges businesses (revenue), but maybe I&#039;ve been misunderstanding the context.Â  From what I can tell, there isn&#039;t a good definitive blog post or definition online - but digging around a bit more it looks like VCs blogs refer to early-stage startups as being pre-funding.Â  Do you have any sources you find particularly helpful?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;d consider &quot;stealth&quot;, &quot;seed&quot;, &quot;angel-backed&quot;, and &quot;VC-backed&quot; to all be flavors of startups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ll have to do some more research.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sunil!</p>
<p>What you say is very interesting. Â I&#8217;ve heard &#8220;early stage company&#8221; used to refer to companies that have been startups for awhile and are transitioning to full fledges businesses (revenue), but maybe I&#8217;ve been misunderstanding the context.Â  From what I can tell, there isn&#8217;t a good definitive blog post or definition online &#8211; but digging around a bit more it looks like VCs blogs refer to early-stage startups as being pre-funding.Â  Do you have any sources you find particularly helpful?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d consider &#8220;stealth&#8221;, &#8220;seed&#8221;, &#8220;angel-backed&#8221;, and &#8220;VC-backed&#8221; to all be flavors of startups.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to do some more research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sunil Garg		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2008/09/do-i-work-for-a-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunil Garg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=527#comment-57</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting. I&#039;m inclined put &quot;early stage&quot; before &quot;startup&quot; in the lifecycle -- I would consider a company that&#039;s defining itself for the first time to be an early stage startup (eg. a company that&#039;s in stealth mode), one that&#039;s still trying to prove itself and its product to (still) be a startup, and one that&#039;s applying a specific business model (whether profitable or not) to be an established business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;m inclined put &#8220;early stage&#8221; before &#8220;startup&#8221; in the lifecycle &#8212; I would consider a company that&#8217;s defining itself for the first time to be an early stage startup (eg. a company that&#8217;s in stealth mode), one that&#8217;s still trying to prove itself and its product to (still) be a startup, and one that&#8217;s applying a specific business model (whether profitable or not) to be an established business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
