<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Celebrities Who Treat Twitter Like Broadcasting Medium Miss the Point	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/</link>
	<description>I can see the future, because I live in it today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: William Carleton		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Carleton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post and some interesting exchanges in the comment thread.  I just wanted to add two comments:  (1) for me, following people is more interesting than following topics (for that reason, I guess, I don&#039;t use search as much as I simply browse my peeps; or, I guess I search from time to time to add peeps more than topics); and (2) I like the term &quot;narrowcasting&quot; to describe what I feel twitter does well for people I want to get certain info to.  To me, it&#039;s not a model for celebrity broadcasts; or, maybe I just don&#039;t get that use of it (but I do follow @stephenfry, I will admit).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and some interesting exchanges in the comment thread.  I just wanted to add two comments:  (1) for me, following people is more interesting than following topics (for that reason, I guess, I don&#8217;t use search as much as I simply browse my peeps; or, I guess I search from time to time to add peeps more than topics); and (2) I like the term &#8220;narrowcasting&#8221; to describe what I feel twitter does well for people I want to get certain info to.  To me, it&#8217;s not a model for celebrity broadcasts; or, maybe I just don&#8217;t get that use of it (but I do follow @stephenfry, I will admit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Douglas		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We just proved we don&#039;t need to follow each other to be able to communicate to each other. :) 

I will likely follow you if you make more tweets interesting to me. ;) - Quality &#062; Quanity to me. otherwise I&#039;ll find you at http://search.twitter.com where I&#039;ll find things I&#039;m interested about.

Thx for the reply, the follow and the great topic. (&#038; Twitter, thank you!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just proved we don&#8217;t need to follow each other to be able to communicate to each other. 🙂 </p>
<p>I will likely follow you if you make more tweets interesting to me. 😉 &#8211; Quality &gt; Quanity to me. otherwise I&#8217;ll find you at <a href="http://search.twitter.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://search.twitter.com</a> where I&#8217;ll find things I&#8217;m interested about.</p>
<p>Thx for the reply, the follow and the great topic. (&amp; Twitter, thank you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2445&quot;&gt;Steve Douglas&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re pretty different from the person who only follow something like 1% or 2% of the people following them.  I&#039;m listening to you, because you said you&#039;re going to talk to your boss about Twilio (which the startup I work for), and I think that&#039;s cool.  So now I&#039;m listening to what you have to say on Twitter, because we&#039;ve got that connection.  I&#039;m not expecting to be followed back, but hoping that in the course of reading my Twitter feed we&#039;ll have a chance to connect again over something else you say.

Didn&#039;t @reply you about that because I though if you followed me back I&#039;d be able to send you a direct message with something like, &quot;how&#039;d the conversation with your boss go?&quot; --- seemed like a good topic for a DM.

Anyway, thanks for the long response :) I saw your tweet that says:
&quot;I wrote a comment the size of a blog last night on someones blog that I never met before. http://bit.ly/KcBBb - b/c it was interesting..&quot; and I&#039;m glad you&#039;re motivated to write long comments, it makes people who blog really happy.

You make a really important though - Twitter is a lot of different things to different people, and for me it&#039;s even different things in different contexts (for example personal interests @daniellemorrill and business at @twilio and seattle tech community and @seattle20 and my cute dog at @rafethedog).  Keeping in mind that people use it in all sorts of ways to communicate with other friends, businesses, brands, celebrities, new, auto-updates, etc. is important to using it because we all have different expectations when it comes to things like frequency of updates, language use (swearing okay?), following back, direct messages, etc.

It&#039;s funny you say you won&#039;t follow me back, since after this exchange I&#039;m even more interested in following you than I was before and have a stronger basis for it now than just you talking about my company.  If you do need anything to help you with Twilio as you get started, you always drop me a line at danielle@twilio.com (or email the whole team at help@twilio.com).  We&#039;re listening. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2445">Steve Douglas</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re pretty different from the person who only follow something like 1% or 2% of the people following them.  I&#8217;m listening to you, because you said you&#8217;re going to talk to your boss about Twilio (which the startup I work for), and I think that&#8217;s cool.  So now I&#8217;m listening to what you have to say on Twitter, because we&#8217;ve got that connection.  I&#8217;m not expecting to be followed back, but hoping that in the course of reading my Twitter feed we&#8217;ll have a chance to connect again over something else you say.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t @reply you about that because I though if you followed me back I&#8217;d be able to send you a direct message with something like, &#8220;how&#8217;d the conversation with your boss go?&#8221; &#8212; seemed like a good topic for a DM.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the long response 🙂 I saw your tweet that says:<br />
&#8220;I wrote a comment the size of a blog last night on someones blog that I never met before. <a href="http://bit.ly/KcBBb" rel="nofollow ugc">http://bit.ly/KcBBb</a> &#8211; b/c it was interesting..&#8221; and I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re motivated to write long comments, it makes people who blog really happy.</p>
<p>You make a really important though &#8211; Twitter is a lot of different things to different people, and for me it&#8217;s even different things in different contexts (for example personal interests @daniellemorrill and business at @twilio and seattle tech community and @seattle20 and my cute dog at @rafethedog).  Keeping in mind that people use it in all sorts of ways to communicate with other friends, businesses, brands, celebrities, new, auto-updates, etc. is important to using it because we all have different expectations when it comes to things like frequency of updates, language use (swearing okay?), following back, direct messages, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny you say you won&#8217;t follow me back, since after this exchange I&#8217;m even more interested in following you than I was before and have a stronger basis for it now than just you talking about my company.  If you do need anything to help you with Twilio as you get started, you always drop me a line at <a href="mailto:danielle@twilio.com">danielle@twilio.com</a> (or email the whole team at <a href="mailto:help@twilio.com">help@twilio.com</a>).  We&#8217;re listening. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Douglas		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;On the other end of the spectrum are those who are followed by many many people but make themselves seem inaccessible by following back only a tiny percentage.&quot;

Woah, woah, woah Danielle I completely disagree. 

Example: You followed me today on twitter. We don&#039;t know each other, never met and we never talked. I just mentioned &quot;twilio&quot; on my account and you followed me.

1.) I don&#039;t follow you on Twitter and I likely won&#039;t. Why? Because I do not know you, you have not introduced yourself and I&#039;m the person engaging in conversation on my own behalf. If it wasn&#039;t for me being interested in learning about you, who you are and what you do then I wouldn&#039;t be sitting on Danielle Morrill&#039;s blog.

Because we do not know each other, you will likely be one of the followers who I do not follow. Just like @aplusk, @oprah and @kingsthings likely do not follow you or myself. Why? Because &quot;we don&#039;t know each other, never met and we never talked...&quot;

2.) Twitter is not officially defined to be Content vs. Quanity or vice versa. The only definition of twitter is user-defined, you make twitter what you feel it is to you. 

My definition of twitter is: Twitter wasn&#039;t designed for celebrities or businesses in mind. It was designed for you and me to engage in conversation we find interesting. If it wasn&#039;t for twitter, I would not be on your blog.

Just suggesting to look at Twitter differently sometimes.

@stevesmename]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the other end of the spectrum are those who are followed by many many people but make themselves seem inaccessible by following back only a tiny percentage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Woah, woah, woah Danielle I completely disagree. </p>
<p>Example: You followed me today on twitter. We don&#8217;t know each other, never met and we never talked. I just mentioned &#8220;twilio&#8221; on my account and you followed me.</p>
<p>1.) I don&#8217;t follow you on Twitter and I likely won&#8217;t. Why? Because I do not know you, you have not introduced yourself and I&#8217;m the person engaging in conversation on my own behalf. If it wasn&#8217;t for me being interested in learning about you, who you are and what you do then I wouldn&#8217;t be sitting on Danielle Morrill&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>Because we do not know each other, you will likely be one of the followers who I do not follow. Just like @aplusk, @oprah and @kingsthings likely do not follow you or myself. Why? Because &#8220;we don&#8217;t know each other, never met and we never talked&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>2.) Twitter is not officially defined to be Content vs. Quanity or vice versa. The only definition of twitter is user-defined, you make twitter what you feel it is to you. </p>
<p>My definition of twitter is: Twitter wasn&#8217;t designed for celebrities or businesses in mind. It was designed for you and me to engage in conversation we find interesting. If it wasn&#8217;t for twitter, I would not be on your blog.</p>
<p>Just suggesting to look at Twitter differently sometimes.</p>
<p>@stevesmename</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Read/Write Twitter - Thoughts on social media, the web and technology - jungleG		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Read/Write Twitter - Thoughts on social media, the web and technology - jungleG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] But what&#8217;s the use of reading what broadcasters say to you and pray that they reply to one of your @ tweets? You might as well watch Access Hollywood or TMZ; it will fulfill more of your need to know about your favorite celebrities than subscribing to their Twitter feed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] But what&#8217;s the use of reading what broadcasters say to you and pray that they reply to one of your @ tweets? You might as well watch Access Hollywood or TMZ; it will fulfill more of your need to know about your favorite celebrities than subscribing to their Twitter feed. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Not Your Father&#8217;s Twitter Anymore - 3 Things the Celebs Change &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Your Father&#8217;s Twitter Anymore - 3 Things the Celebs Change &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] say conversation isn&#8217;t incredibly important to its growth. But many people feel that two-way conversations are all it&#8217;s about. The ability to broadcast, without guilt, is the fundamental engine of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] say conversation isn&#8217;t incredibly important to its growth. But many people feel that two-way conversations are all it&#8217;s about. The ability to broadcast, without guilt, is the fundamental engine of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Song		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Song]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for reminding us all again that conversations and engagements are what makes Twitter special.
John]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reminding us all again that conversations and engagements are what makes Twitter special.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: charl pearce (@simchabe)		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2009/04/celebrities-who-treat-twitter-like-broadcasting-medium-miss-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charl pearce (@simchabe)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=1027#comment-2440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very well put, Danielle and I completely agree.  I was just having this same conversation last night.  If you aren&#039;t following, ur not listening, ur broadcasting.  If u want 2 broadcast, get on Alltop.com &#038; allow others 2 sign up for your daily diary.

I do follow a couple musicians, as I want to be &#039;in the know&#039; when they release something new BUT also because I am interested in how they manage their SM relationships (mainly @trent_reznor).

One thing I&#039;d like to avoid, is celeb rt magpies.  Basically, seeing a bunch of ppl sending &quot;RT for a chance to win something (RT @oprah 1st 100 to RT win a free snuggie).  now, if one comes across for a free car or house, you&#039;ll see me on that rt wagon. 

Is it bad to feel that my shiny secret toy has been discovered by the real world?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put, Danielle and I completely agree.  I was just having this same conversation last night.  If you aren&#8217;t following, ur not listening, ur broadcasting.  If u want 2 broadcast, get on Alltop.com &amp; allow others 2 sign up for your daily diary.</p>
<p>I do follow a couple musicians, as I want to be &#8216;in the know&#8217; when they release something new BUT also because I am interested in how they manage their SM relationships (mainly @trent_reznor).</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d like to avoid, is celeb rt magpies.  Basically, seeing a bunch of ppl sending &#8220;RT for a chance to win something (RT @oprah 1st 100 to RT win a free snuggie).  now, if one comes across for a free car or house, you&#8217;ll see me on that rt wagon. </p>
<p>Is it bad to feel that my shiny secret toy has been discovered by the real world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
