There’s good stuff. It’s hard to go wrong if one just takes away Landmark’s emphasis on responsibility and clear communication. After that it’s like visiting a different culture and gaining a new perspective on your own. I’d say that Landmark is good as a “whack on the side of the head” rather than as an answer. (They tell you that Landmark is not an answer, but you sure wouldn’t know that from its more enthusiastic participants.)

The bad or at least annoying side of Landmark is the relentless push to enroll others in Landmark. It’s not pointless. We all have to “enroll” others into some aspect of our lives — friends, jobs, lovers and so forth — so it’s good practice … to a point. But after some number of Landmark seminars enrollment gets old. You’ve burned out your friends and co-workers on the subject of Landmark. Likely you’ve also reached a point of diminishing returns on the Landmark “technology.”

You’re correct that most people cycle through Landmark in a two or three years unless they become committed to rising through the volunteer hierarchy to become Seminar or Forum Leaders — that’s a whole ‘nother game.

To make it worse I had just come out off a long-term relationship with a guy that had a large penis. Politically-correct girls say that the right size depends on preference and compatibility. However I’m not politically correct and even the politically correct would prefer their men to be well hung.

Anyway, you can read more about how my boyfriend went from small penis loser to huge bedroom stud on my diary at sarahsdiary.com.

http://sarahsdiary.com/images/image300x100.jpg

Sarah xXx