<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Weekly WTF: Barking Apps Files S-1 to Raise $100,000 on OTCBB	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/weekly-wtf-barking-apps-files-s-1-to-raise-100000-on-otcbb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/weekly-wtf-barking-apps-files-s-1-to-raise-100000-on-otcbb/</link>
	<description>I can see the future, because I live in it today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig Montuori		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/weekly-wtf-barking-apps-files-s-1-to-raise-100000-on-otcbb/comment-page-1/#comment-12577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Montuori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=4893#comment-12577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if they&#039;re making use of the JOBS Act&#039;s Reg A mini-IPO?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they&#8217;re making use of the JOBS Act&#8217;s Reg A mini-IPO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Elliott		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/weekly-wtf-barking-apps-files-s-1-to-raise-100000-on-otcbb/comment-page-1/#comment-12438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Elliott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=4893#comment-12438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Danielle

Have seen this many times before. Could certainly walk through the nuances if you are ever interested. 

Hope you are well!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle</p>
<p>Have seen this many times before. Could certainly walk through the nuances if you are ever interested. </p>
<p>Hope you are well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cameron Newland		</title>
		<link>https://www.daniellemorrill.com/2013/04/weekly-wtf-barking-apps-files-s-1-to-raise-100000-on-otcbb/comment-page-1/#comment-12436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron Newland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellemorrill.com/?p=4893#comment-12436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t mean to unfairly smear those legitimate companies that happen to be listed on the OTCBB, but it should be noted that companies listed on the Pink Sheets/OTCBB are often very speculative endeavors and carry a high degree of risk. The risk inherent in investing in this company may be no higher than investing in a seed stage privately-held venture that has no revenue.

Another thing to note is that often, OTCBB companies are easily able to raise money based solely upon a short description of that they&#039;re hoping to do. It&#039;s not uncommon to see one OTCBB-listed company with no ongoing operating business get bought out by another company (buying a public listing, basically) only to change the name of the combined company and then trumpet a bunch of buzzword-filled press releases about how they&#039;re attacking some &quot;large, growing market&quot; (like alternative fuels, vague technology, et cetera). It&#039;s often pump-and-dump penny stock manipulation, but occasionally there are real businesses that are birthed from the depths of the OTCBB. One example (though it&#039;s not without controversy) is ZAP Electric, which makes and sells electric vehicles and does more than $50M in annual revenue.
I actually think that early-stage startups ought to tap the public markets (like OTCBB/Pink Sheets) more often, because there are quite a few investors willing to take risks and pay high valuations on speculative ventures. Often the cost of compliance is low because companies listed on these exchanges don&#039;t have to pay for the costly independent audits that bigger publicly listed companies are required to have prepared each reporting period.
Is this particular investment likely very high-risk? It looks like it. But is their financing strategy clever? Absolutely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to unfairly smear those legitimate companies that happen to be listed on the OTCBB, but it should be noted that companies listed on the Pink Sheets/OTCBB are often very speculative endeavors and carry a high degree of risk. The risk inherent in investing in this company may be no higher than investing in a seed stage privately-held venture that has no revenue.</p>
<p>Another thing to note is that often, OTCBB companies are easily able to raise money based solely upon a short description of that they&#8217;re hoping to do. It&#8217;s not uncommon to see one OTCBB-listed company with no ongoing operating business get bought out by another company (buying a public listing, basically) only to change the name of the combined company and then trumpet a bunch of buzzword-filled press releases about how they&#8217;re attacking some &#8220;large, growing market&#8221; (like alternative fuels, vague technology, et cetera). It&#8217;s often pump-and-dump penny stock manipulation, but occasionally there are real businesses that are birthed from the depths of the OTCBB. One example (though it&#8217;s not without controversy) is ZAP Electric, which makes and sells electric vehicles and does more than $50M in annual revenue.<br />
I actually think that early-stage startups ought to tap the public markets (like OTCBB/Pink Sheets) more often, because there are quite a few investors willing to take risks and pay high valuations on speculative ventures. Often the cost of compliance is low because companies listed on these exchanges don&#8217;t have to pay for the costly independent audits that bigger publicly listed companies are required to have prepared each reporting period.<br />
Is this particular investment likely very high-risk? It looks like it. But is their financing strategy clever? Absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
